Ocean Circulation

There is an on-going debate between atmospheric scientists that, more or less, comprise two groups. The first group relies on Global Climate Models and accepts the data as proof that global warming is occurring beyond what would be described as part of the natural cycle and that this accelerated warming is anthropogenic (exacerbated by man.)

The second group of scientists do not accept these simulations as accurate, they feel that the warming is very much a part of that natural cycle of things, some argue that the warming will slow and, in fact, a cooling trend is upon us.

The second group reasons that the deep ocean circulation is the primary force that governs global temperatures, which is why the rhetoric has been changed from Global Warming to Global Climate Change. It is the deep ocean cycle that explains how two cities on the same latitude can have dramatically different temperatures.

This is a good debate to have. The problem as we see it is that, if the first group of scientists is correct, then time is not really on our side. Secondly, how can it be wrong to think in terms of carbon sinks, renewable energy sources, and cleaning up after ourselves. Even those scientists who believe we need to rely on a fossil fuel-based economy suggest researching alternative energy resources. It does bring up the question why? However, so be it.

Our job then – those of us who are not legitimate scientists – is still to raise consciousness and general awareness. There are far too many people today who do not recycle their plastics – who do not even consider it – and whose garbage can not find the trash bin. Our oceans are turning into garbage dumps and, contrary to what most civilians would believe, most scientists, no matter which camp they fall in, would probably argue against the long held belief that the oceans can handle it.

Tagged as: Add new tag, Anthropogenic, Climate change, Fossil fuel, Renewable energy